↓
 

StudioMicZone

Microphones and Recording Techniques for Small and Home Studios.

Studio Mic Zone - Microphone and recording techniques for small and home studios.
  • Home
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • About StudioMicZone
  • About the Blogger

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Loving Light

StudioMicZone

The first start-to-finish project in the new studio was Lee Murdock’s 20th album Loving Light. One of the reasons that I decided to build a studio at home was to be able to continue to work on his projects. Since he had provided much of the carpentry skills for my other studio and was providing much of the planning and carpentry skills on the new space we made sure that the new space would meet the needs of his album production. We were not disappointed with how well the process went for Loving Light.

We followed our usual process of recording. Lee singing into an Equitek E200 while playing guitar and miking the guitar with a pair of Shure SM-81s, one above the 12th fret and the other below the soundhole and near the bottom outside edge of the guitar. We don’t use a click track. We will usually record the bass and possibly another backing instrument at the same time. Drums are overdubbed, as are additional instruments and background vocals and any percussion.

Lee Murdock during Loving Light session.

Lee and I work together on the mix. We use light EQ and compression as necessary. Sometimes there will be minor editing and punch-ins if necessary. Since Lee sings and plays at the same time, which is an important part of his “sound,” he will need to both sing and play for any guitar or vocal fixes. We use two or three different reverbs as necessary. Lee’s trademark sound is clean and unprocessed, so we don’t add any distortion or analog processing.

Since we have worked together on the mixes and listened to them on multiple sets of speakers as the mixes are finalized, mastering is simple. Sound Forge is my mastering tool. I clean up the head-end of the song and do the final fade on the ending. Then I will do usually between 3 dB and 6 dB of peak limiting using the Wave Hammer plug-in with compression turned off. I set the amount by visually looking at the peaks. I have learned this from years of experience and do just enough so that the effect is not audible. Then I load the album into CD Architect and set the song order and spacing. Then I balance the levels of the songs by matching the vocal levels. At this point, we are rarely making more than 1 dB to 2 dB adjustment to the song levels. Then I add the CD text to the file and burn a couple of CDs. We both give them a listen in the car, and on home systems. I’ll make any minor changes after that and burn the final masters.

We are both extremely happy with the final album and how well the process went. The album will be released in November. Available at leemurdock.com.

Posted in Miking Techniques and Recording, Other, Studio Construction

The Three-To-One Ratio Rule

StudioMicZone

There are a few rules-of-thumb in recording that are useful and time-saving. The three-two-one ratio rule is one of those that will assist you when you are setting up a recording session for multiple musicians, and it’s just as useful if you are miking a live concert.

One of the essential books for understanding microphones is Microphones: Design and Application, a 1974 book written by Lou Burroughs, one of the founders of Electro-Voice. This book is an excellent course in the basics of microphone usage, both in sound reinforcement recording.

One of the principles developed by Burroughs was the three-to-one ratio rule.

This rule is an empirical rule determined by listening tests for microphone placement and sets a minimum distance between microphones to avoid degradation in the sound from a given source. So, it is the minimum distance between microphones to keep noticeable bleed-through and phase problems under control.

The rule is: The distance between any two microphones must be at least three times as great as the distance between the microphone and the source of sound which it is to pick up.

So, for example, if you are miking a violinist and a cellist and the microphones are 2 feet away from their instruments, the microphones should be separated by a minimum of about 6 feet.  I also believe that the rule implies that the sources will be of similar volume levels. Recording a screaming guitar amp in the same room with a quiet acoustic guitar is probably not going to work.

Remember, this is a guideline, not a precise law. But, keeping this in mind should make setup for sessions easier and help you avoid bleed-through and phasing problems between microphones.

Posted in Microphone Fundamentals, Miking Techniques and Recording

Condenser Microphone Mods

StudioMicZone

Studio Projects C1 and C3 Microphones with new capsule and mod kit.It’s amazing the number of small manufacturers creating great microphones. It’s good to have a “palette” of different sounding microphones to record with, and the large number of companies building quality microphones and providing modification kits and services makes it easier to build a diverse microphone collection.

I’ve acquired Studio Projects C1 and C3 microphones as these microphones have outstanding electronics. Both the “B” and “C” series Studio Projects microphones use a transformerless circuit based on the Schoeps design. Brent Casey of PMI adapted the design and it is built with quality components. Some find the microphone a little too bright and there are a couple of solutions.

I have upgraded the circuit in the C1 with an upgrade kit from microphone-parts.com.  This mod kit provides an adjustable high-frequency roll-off to tame the brightness of the microphone. If you have never modified a microphone before, this kit is a good place to start because it is very simple, and the C1 and C3 microphones are large and easy to work on.

Another way to reduce the high-end on the mike is to replace the capsule with a darker capsule like the MicParts RK-47. With this capsule, the EQ kit isn’t necessary. I replaced the capsule in the C3 with an RK-47 capsule. I’m looking for another C3 that I will modify with the circuit upgrade kit and install an RK-12, AKG style capsule. I used these mikes on a brass section and they sounded great. I can’t wait to try them out on other sources including vocals.

Posted in Microphone Modifications | Tagged Condenser Microphone, Microphone, Microphone Mods, Studio Projects

Shure 556B Dynamic Microphone

StudioMicZone

Classic Shure 556 Unidyne dynamic microphone.I’m starting to organize some of the stuff I brought from the old studio and found this old Shure Model 556B “Fatboy” microphone that I bought at a flea-market, probably about 15 years ago. It was one of the original Unidyne, 55 series mikes, and I bought it mostly for decorative purposes.

The 556B is the mike that Elvis and others used at Memphis Recording Service during some of their early recordings for Sun Records. (Not this particular microphone, but the same model.)

The 556B that I have is a broadcast mike, whereas the 555 is a general purpose microphone. Bob LaJeunesse tells me that the data sheet has a 1942 date, so the mike could be pretty old. The “B” indicates that the impedance is 200-250 ohms. Strangely, when Shure introduced the Unidyne II in 1951 which is about 2/3 the size of the original Unidynes, they kept the same model numbers for the new microphones. So there was a Unidyne 556 like mine and a smaller Unidyne II 556. Very confusing. The smaller Unidyne II was re-issued several years ago, with a more modern cartridge, and is still available new.

Model number trivia aside, I plugged the mike in this morning, which I thought I had never done, but Kevin Mileski reminded me we used it on his first album – the memory is going. A quick check proves it still sounds really great. Rumor has it that we’ll be using it on some vocal sessions shortly, stay tuned.

Posted in Classic & Antique Microphones | Tagged Dynamic Microphone, Shure, Unidyne

External Noise Evaluation

StudioMicZone

I was aware of the possibility that I would occasionally have a problem with recording due to external noise that was beyond my control. It could be a lawnmower, chainsaw or any of a variety of outdoor tools and appliances, and it could happen at any time. I hadn’t had an opportunity to gauge the amount of threat that existed. Until last week.

There were several large maples and a pear tree that were shading my garden so much that I soon wouldn’t have enough sunlight to grow vegetables, so I contracted to have the trees removed. The crew worked quickly and efficiently and once enough of the trees were down, it was time to grind up the branches.

They parked the large chipper in my driveway, which put it 15-20 feet from my basement control room. If you have never been near an operating wood chipper, they are one of the loudest mechanical devices you will ever encounter. This machine would be the ultimate test of sound isolation for my new studio.

Once the engine was going and they were grinding branches and limbs on a continuous basis, I headed for the basement. I sat in the control room with the chipper less than 20 feet away, and although audible, it would not have been disruptive to a recording or mixing session.

I went out to the studio and listened. If I listened really hard, it was just barely audible. I can’t think of any close-miking situation where the sound would have gotten into the recording. That was excellent news! I was convinced that no matter what is going on outside, recording or mixing wouldn’t be disturbed. After this, if any outdoor sounds disrupt a recording session, I know that I probably have a lot bigger problems than an interrupted session.

Posted in Miking Techniques and Recording, Monitoring and Listening, Studio Construction

Testing the Recording Space

StudioMicZone
Randy, all ready to play.

When I decided to move my studio home, I knew that I would be facing many compromises, the largest being that I would only be able to record a few musicians. I thought that drums might be a bit iffy and that any choir recording would be out. Nevertheless, Gary had a couple of projects in the works, one for Rory cooney and another for Tony Alonzo, so we decided to push the limits and see what we could get away with in my rec room.

The first gig was drums. Randy Carpenter came up from Louisianna to play drums on the album. We set up the drums and miked the set and just using the two overheads and the kick mike, an Audix D6, got a really nice sound. We miked the rest of the set and were extremely happy with what we heard. 

Looking over the music before the session.

A few days later we recorded the choir tracks for several albums. We have a 12 voice SATB choir. We gathered them around the four microphones, one for each section. We tried a couple of tracks and I was ecstatic. The sound was clean and uncluttered. There was sufficient separation between the microphones and everyone loved working in this space. They all thought they could hear better and all thought it was more comfortable to work in as compared to the old space. The parking was a lot better also!

So we are happy. The studio will be much more useful than I could have hoped for. I’ll still plan on doing some more tweaking with the sound treatment and with the arrangement of the room, but it is workable as it is.

Posted in Miking Techniques and Recording, Studio Construction

Good Vibes and Studio Magic

StudioMicZone
Tribute to Merle Haggard and Okie Form Muskogee

We were able to get away from the icy Illinois weather and spend a week in sunny San Antonio in the middle of February. My wife was at a conference during the day, so I had plenty of downtimes to explore the city and just relax. They were experiencing an early spring and the temperature was getting near 80 every day. That kind of weather in February was definitely good for recharging the spirit.

Strangely, we kept running into things of musical significance, so I snapped a few pictures with my new Samsung Smartphone. I had my DSLR with me, but the pictures from my Galaxy S5 Note were so amazing that the DSLR never came out of the camera bag. This may be the future of photography.

The first stop was in Muskogee, Oklahoma. Right at the edge of town was a tribute to Merle Haggard and his song Okie from Muskogee.

Doobie Brothers’ China Grove

We stayed in McAllister, Oklahoma, for the night and then headed off in the morning for Texas. We crossed the Texas border and went through Dallas and on to Waco. Then we stopped for lunch at the famous Rudy’s “Country Store” and Bar-B-Q, and sampled some Texas Barbequed brisket and then we were back on the road and on our way to our destination.

Heading into San Antonio, I took a little detour to the south and got a picture of the China Grove sign, and paid silent tribute to one of my favorite Doobie Brothers songs.

I spent the week touring the many missions in San Antonio, and of course the most famous one, the Alamo. Having seen pictures of the Alamo, I had assumed that it was out in the middle of nowhere, but it is actually right in the center of downtown San Antonio. I had a quiet lunch overlooking the city from the Tower of the Americas and also spent a bit of time on the beautiful Riverwalk.

The old Post Office and General Store in Luckenbach, Texas.

At the end of the week, we were able to drive out into beautiful Texas hill country and visit a winery and an olive oil ranch. As we drove around, we kept seeing signs for a place named Luckenbach, Texas, that said, “Live Music Every Day.” In my ignorance of country music, I had never heard of it, but we took some back roads and found it. Wow, what a place. We visited the general store, grabbed a beer and listened to the jam sessions for a couple of hours before heading back to San Antonio.

The next day we began our trek back to snowy Illinois, but because of a mixup in plans, we weren’t going to be stopping in St. Louis.

Your webmaster at the controls of the vintage board in Sun Studio with Elvis’s ghost in the Control Room window.

So, since we had a couple of extra days, we took a little detour from our planned route and stopped in Memphis to visit the legendary Sun Studio. We took the studio tour, led by the most capable Lahna Deering of Deering and Down. The control room wasn’t on the tour, but Natalie talked to the tour guide and we were able to join a group of students from a college in Nashville and get a look inside the restored control room. Sitting behind that old console brought back a lot of memories. I had a couple of Ampex 351 recorders and a Presto disc cutting lathe when I opened my studio.

The legendary Sun Studio, the place where Rock and Roll began.

For a boxy room with 1950s acoustical tile on the walls, the studio space actually sounded very nice. But then I had a flash of insight as I stood in the space where Elvis had his beginning and the Million Dollar Quartet made their famous recording. I am guessing that this is true not only for classic recording spaces but classic equipment and microphones as well.

If you want to measure specifications, older equipment and microphones are inferior to much of what is being produced today. Studio and control room design has evolved greatly, also. We’ve had 70+ years of engineering and technical expertise to improve the equipment since the early days of recording. I firmly believe that today’s equipment is more precise and has less distortion and noise than the equipment of yesteryear. That said, a lot more goes into creating great music than technological perfection.

If I am performing in the space where Rock and Roll got its start surrounded by images of these pioneers of music and the equipment they used, my performance will probably be different than if I were in some generic new studio with all of the latest digital equipment. There is an intangible value to these old spaces, classic microphones, and other vintage electronics that goes well beyond whatever contribution they might make to the sound. It is our connection to our roots and it evokes reverence and respect for the artistic contributions of our predecessors.

When the tours end at Sun Studio in the late afternoon, the studio comes to life again and is open for evening sessions. Doing a session at Sun Studio with one of my favorite groups is at the top of my bucket list.

Posted in Other

Sony ECM-22P Microphone

StudioMicZone

Sony ECM-22P Microphone

Sony ECM-22P Microphone

When I started in the recording business in 1973, my work was primarily live concert recording for schools and churches. My location setup was a Teac 7030 2-track reel-to-reel recorder, a Shure M-688 stereo mixer, and two Sony ECM-22P Electret condenser microphones.

Sony’s ECM series of electret microphones were a game-changing innovation in condenser microphones when they were first introduced in 1968. First of all, the electret capsule in the microphone did not require a separate bias voltage. Electret technology allowed a permanent electrical charge to be applied to either the diaphragm or the backplate of the microphone capsule, similar to the way a permanent magnet is magnetized, except in this case it is an electrical field rather than a magnetic field.

Elimination of this need for external bias meant that there was less circuitry inside the microphone and no external bias power supply was required. Phantom power had only made its way into microphone technology a few years prior, so most condenser microphones still had an external power supply.

The other innovation was the use of a JFET transistor amplifier for the electret capsule. Solid state circuitry was only introduced into condenser microphones a few years before this, so many condenser microphones still required heavy, bulky power supplies for their vacuum tube amplifiers. In fact, the Neumann U-87 solid state microphone was released in 1972.

So the ECM-22P was a real innovation and quite revolutionary. It brought the cost of a quality condenser microphone within reach of the small and home studio owner and was one of the products that helped fuel the home recording revolution. I paid about $100 each for the pair of microphones at that time.

Sony ECM-22P Microphone Internal View

Sony ECM-22P Microphone Internal View

This mike was powered by an Eveready 206 9V battery which was expensive and hard to find, or from phantom power. I didn’t have a phantom powered mixer at the time, and there were few, if any, available. If you forgot to turn the switch on the mike off, it was likely the battery would be drained the next time you needed to use it.

The circuitry in the microphone was very simple with a single JFET driving an output transformer with a switchable 600 or 250-ohm output. The power switch had three positions, Off, Music, and Voice. The voice position engaged a low-frequency roll off filter.

The ECM-22P is a cardioid microphone with a rated frequency response of 40-15,000 kHz. The signal-to-noise ratio was 66 dB, which is quite noisy by today’s standards, but a little better than the signal-to-noise of a reel-to-reel recorder running at 15 ips. with high-bias mastering tape. So the mikes performed well for me for some years.

I bought another pair of the microphones when I moved from my home studio into a commercial space in 1976. I still have all four of them, and they all still work even though I don’t use them anymore. I eventually replaced them in the early 1980’s with Shure SM-81 microphones which still get a lot of use today.

 

Posted in Classic & Antique Microphones | Tagged ECM-22P, Electret, Microphone, Sony

Evaluation – Calibrating Your Ears & Checking Your Monitoring

StudioMicZone

So, I’ve finally finished my great sounding new studio. Now what?  It’s time for calibrating my ears to the new room. I did this periodically in my old space, particularly after changes in equipment and any upgrades to the structure or sound treatment. And maybe most importantly, before beginning the mixing of any new album.

Every control room sounds different. Even the best studios with the best speakers sound different from one another. They have different speakers and speaker placements, different designs, different amplifiers and different equipment and furniture bouncing the sound around in the room. This difference will be even more apparent for non-professionally designed and sub-optimally constructed home and small studios.

I am assuming that you have been listening as you put your room together and corrected any major problems during the construction process.

Part of the process is knowing how well-recorded and mixed albums sound in your room. In a new space, it’s also about listening for any problems in acoustical design or the monitoring system and any quirks or deficiencies in the sound. Plan on spending a lot of time listening to music in any new control room or on any new set of speakers. I am talking about maybe 4 to 5 hours per week for a couple of months. Most of this time needs to be active listening, not background music. Listen to each instrument in the mix and how it sounds. Listen to the 3D field of the mix, where is each instrument placed and what the perception of the performance space is.

The playlist is important because listening to poorly mixed music is going to falsely calibrate your ears and lead you to bad sounding mixes. You’ll want to listen to music in the genre’s that you usually work in, and search for albums in that genre that are noted for their outstanding engineering and sound. A little bit of Internet research should help you formulate a list.

And it should go without saying that you should not be listening to any MP3 or otherwise compressed files. Listen to CDs or at least 16bit .wav files recorded at 44.1 kHz or higher. Compressed files sound fine for casual listening, but not for critical listening. Save them for when you are in the car or out jogging.

You should also listen to some of your favorite music as long is it is of good quality and again no compressed files. The last items on the list should be good quality music that you have produced in the past, assuming you are not just starting out.

Then start listening. Get it into your head how a well-mixed piece sounds in your room. Stand up, lean forward and back, move sideways in either direction. Is the sound consistent? Or is there a “sweet spot” you need to be in to hear correctly? Put on a track with a lot of bass and walk around the room. Listen for spots where the bass goes away or gets very boomy. If it’s a problem, you maybe need to add some bass traps in the corners of the room. At least you can have your clients avoid standing in those places when you are mixing, so they do not hear false bass.

Listen to a recording where you know that the vocalist is centered, sit in your mixing position and close your eyes and make sure the vocalist is in the center. If the vocalist is off center, you may have a problem with symmetry in the room, or maybe the gain on one channel of the amplifier needs to go up or down a dB or two. Make sure the connections from the output of your workstation, to the monitor mixer if you have one, and to the amp are good. Make sure the switches in the monitor mixer are making good contact. On my Mackie BigKnob, I have a switch that occasionally goes flaky and upsets the channel balance. I flick it about 20 times, and it’s fine for a few months again.

If you have more than one set of monitors, do it with each set. In addition to my main monitors, which are JBL L100s, we have a set of NS-10 near field monitors, and I run these checks on both sets, though I do most of my listening on the L100s. After listening consistently for a few days you’ll get an idea of what well-mixed music should sound like in your room, you’ll also know if there are any serious deficiencies in the space or monitors that need fixing.

After a week or so of listening in my new room, I thought I had occasionally been hearing some brittleness in the sound. I finally decided that the problem was the tweeter in the left L100 which I replaced. The brittleness went away. The L100s have adjustments for volume to the tweeter and the midrange speaker. At this time, after a few weeks of listening, I made some minor changes to these settings for what I thought was the most balanced sound in the room.

For my regular checks, I have 6 or 7 songs in a file that I use for listening tests. They are a variety of styles and arrangements that let me evaluate my monitor system. I’ll do a listening test every few months just to make sure the system is working properly, checking for distortion, stereo imaging and any other problems that might pop up. I also spend a half hour or so listening before mixing a new project. I listen to the songs I use for testing plus some of the artist’s recordings. I may also listen to the recordings of other artists when my client tells me, “I want my songs to sound like Artist X’s new album.” That sometimes helps with the mixing.

Knowing what a good mix sounds like in your listening space helps you become a better engineer and produce a better product.

A couple of other tips on mixing and listening. During a long mixing session, there will be a point where everything sounds terrible no matter what you. This is the time to stop and resume again tomorrow with a set of fresh ears. When listening fatigue sets in, you are not going to be happy with your mix, so it is best just to stop.

When you have finished a mix, let it sit for a couple of days and then listen to it again and make sure you are still happy with the final product. Listen to it in the car and a couple of other home systems to make sure it sounds good there also.

Posted in Mixing, Monitoring and Listening, Studio Construction | Tagged DIY Studio, Home Studio, Mixing, Monitoring, Studio Construction

Home Studio (Part 8 of 8) – Finishing Up

StudioMicZone

Control Room Front View

Control Room Front View

It’s time to finish up a few leftover tasks in the room and upgrade the equipment and software to the latest.

The computer we were running for audio was an old Windows XP machine, and I was running ProTools 7.5. I wanted to upgrade to Windows 10, and the ProTools 11.  This old machine just wouldn’t cut it anymore, so I built a new machine that was almost identical to my video editing machine. It has an Intel i7 Haswell 6-core processor, 16 Gigabytes of RAM and an SSD drive for the C drive. The computer is built into an NZXT cabinet, which is acoustically insulated and about as quiet as possible. I installed four, 4-Terabyte hard drives for storage and backup.

I installed Windows 8, and then 10 when it became available shortly after that, and subscribed to ProTools so that we always have the latest version. The upgrade went smoothly, ProTools integrated easily with the Digi 003 and rarely crashes anymore.

I spend a lot of time listening to different material, both my own recordings and commercial recordings that have a reputation for being well-recorded. The JBL speakers have adjustments for the midrange speaker and the tweeter, over the past few weeks I have adjusted those for the most balanced sound. I was still noticing an occasional brittleness in some of the sound and wound up replacing the tweeter in one of the speakers. I had replaced the one in the other speaker a few years back.  I think I am now satisfied that the speakers and everything in the sound chain are working correctly. We’ll discuss this listening process in detail in a future post.

I built a set of shelves under the diffuser at the back of the room to hold microphones and other odds and ends. Our old microphone collection is displayed on the top of it.

There was a final bit of decorating to do; I added the Norwest sign to the back diffuser, added some dark red accent strips to all of the diffusers, matching the color of the ATS panels.  I also built a cable cover that covered the wires coming to the rack between the two ATS absorption panels. I added a couple of VU meters, mostly for looks, to the panel to the left of the Digi 003 and build an oak frame to hold the Mackie BigKnob. There was probably a bunch of other trim items and painting done at this point.

Control room, rear view.

Control room, rear view.

Finally, without a window, the front wall looked a bit empty, so I designed a Norwest Studios sign for the front wall and had it printed by Office Max and then glued to foam core. I was worried that it might affect the sound, but it didn’t since the foam core is quite dead and absorptive.

I am extremely pleased with the sound of the room. The stereo imaging and sound are good no matter where you sit. This room is considerably better that the control room at my old studio. It’s also a lot more comfortable.

A home studio is probably not a good fit if you are working with whoever comes in off the street. But, if you are doing your own recordings, or working with a select list of clients that you have known for a while, this is a very comfortable situation both for you and the people you are recording. Also, a relaxed, comfortable environment encourages a good performance and creativity and produces a better end product.

It’s been a long road, and the project took longer than I had planned, but it has certainly been worth the effort. I am ecstatic with the results that we achieved and don’t miss my old space in the least bit.

Before and After Pictures

Front Wall

Before - Front Wall

Before – Front Wall

After - Front Wall

After – Front Wall

 

Back Wall and Closet

Before – Back Wall & Closet

After – Back Wall & Closet

 

Side View

Before - Side View

Before – Side View

After - Side View

After – Side View

Posted in Other, Studio Construction | Tagged DIY Studio, Home Studio, Studio Construction

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Visit us on:

Search

Categories

  • Audio For Video
  • Audio Fundamentals
  • Choosing & Buying Microphones
  • Classic & Antique Microphones
  • Hints and Tips
  • Microphone Accessories
  • Microphone Fundamentals
  • Microphone Modifications
  • Microphone Reviews
  • Microphone Teardown & Repair
  • Miking Techniques and Recording
  • Mixing
  • Monitoring and Listening
  • Other
  • Podcasting
  • Software
  • Studio Construction

Archives

  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
Copyright © 2025 by Norwest Communications Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Weaver Xtreme Theme
↑